Welcome to the Order, NON-STOPPING GAMER2009!
Welcome to the Assassin's Creed Wiki!
We hope you enjoy your stay, and we look forward to working with you!
|Have you something to say?|
We seek unity, stability and order.
|We wish you safety and peace on your future endeavors.|
I suppose you are pretty new to the wiki, so there's alot of things that you are unfamiliarly with. I would suggest that you read up on our Wiki's policies and not just blindly create articles and upload images. I would also suggest that you refrain from edit spamming, such as making edits to an artice within a short period of time. If you wish to make the edit, ensure that you include enough or all the details that is needed at once. XOdeyssusx (talk) 12:28, May 27, 2020 (UTC)
I don't wish to keep on reminding you, but it seems like you never seem to read up on our Manual of Style and Guidelines at all, despite my message above telling you to do so. Your edits are also disruptive, you create articles with less than a few lines, uploading images from Wikipedia even though they aren't from any AC media. XOdeyssusx (talk) 14:41, June 6, 2020 (UTC)
Ok, the image from Reconquista wasn't from Wikipedia. You can feel free to change it. NON-STOPPING GAMER2009 (talk) 14:46, June 6, 2020 (UTC)
Your Byzantine Conversation
I appreciate your fervor for adding to the Byzantine content on the Wiki, and I want you to know that the ACWiki stands with Greece and every other country for their peace and freedom.
However, content on our pages can only be for in-universe lore. There are lots of stories throughout the world that AC has not covered, and calling one of our editors racist for not considering out-of-game content for inclusion on in-game pages is not an acceptable tactic to get your way.
For Odyessus, a good user
I called him something that he is not. I am the racist. The one who says it, he is. NON-STOPPING GAMER2009 (talk) 18:42, June 7, 2020 (UTC)
I'm giving you a three-day hold to read Assassin's Creed Wiki:Manual of Style and Assassin's Creed Wiki:Community guidelines. Your edits to Soldier and Civilian did a lot of damage, and this is easily preventable. If you would like to talk about sandboxing, forum proposals, or other methods of collaborating with the community at large, please leave me a talkpage message. DarkFeather Raven's NestRaven's Hunt 19:06, June 9, 2020 (UTC)
Non-stopping Gamer, please stop modifying the infoboxes of articles to remove unused parameters. Since unused parameters won't appear on the article anyways, they're supposed to be left there for the convenience of future editors updating the infobox. Otherwise, future editors will have to go search for the infobox, repaste it to the article, then refill everything again. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 18:12, June 17, 2020 (UTC)
Yo I see you like contributing to enemy types but it sometimes gets reworked. I’m working on a new article for that: https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/wiki/User:Lacrossedeamon/Animus_Archetype. It could use some help if you’re willing. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 18:13, June 17, 2020 (UTC)
Hey thanks for your interest on the page. So for Rebellion it’s only the British Navy appearing so that’s why the sub header wasn’t the full British military which would be more ACIII. As you can see I plan on moving all of the sections into the tanners and use that space to talk about tactics without going too much into gameplay terminology unless other admin agree that it can be done so through the frame of the animus. As for pictures I’m trying to pull images from guides that are online like prima or for odyssey’ case from their story creator mode. Rebellion's are from in game assets. Preferably I’d want to avoid screenshots. If you want to add pictures from the chronicle games from their database entries and put those into tabbed sections that would be a great place to start. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 16:58, June 19, 2020 (UTC)
I know that in an official article I would not include but since it is not yet an official article I am not going to put a  notation in it. The reason I have it is that I don't know for a fact that those two belong in those categories. The Master might be in the EIC since they also include native Indians as well. I have never played ACCI so I don't know what context they are in. With the Armored Knight they could either be in the Spanish Army, Templar forces, or Inquisition forces. That guy I have played but there is no confirmation in it. Also for your Myrmidon, etc those would be on this page under HR 8.5 Isu forces. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 08:46, June 26, 2020 (UTC)
Pretty sure the human rebels from the DLC have different archetype name more similar to the Isu servant forces. At least the ones in Atlantis do, not sure about in Elysium. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 19:20, June 28, 2020 (UTC)
Then you go on to the talk pages for Governor etc and open the topic to change the article name to Governor (Animus Avatar) before making a page for the occupation. You shouldn’t disregard MOS, you should disambiguate. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 19:05, June 28, 2020 (UTC)
Even if you don’t know how to name change without redirect (it’s honestly just a checkbox) still open a discussion on a talk page first. Don’t unilaterally make a decision that goes against the MOS. If the issue has merit other editors will help out. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 19:16, June 28, 2020 (UTC)
You should already have the ability. It’s literally just a checkbox to leave a redirect as I said. But again TALK PAGE FIRST and give it enough time for other editors to weigh in.Lacrossedeamon (talk) 19:25, June 28, 2020 (UTC)
Before you make any name changes or create new articles either please open a discussion on said article's talk page or better yet create a forum post for it so we can address the issue as a whole. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 09:54, June 29, 2020 (UTC)
Non-stopping gamer, I recognize that ideally, I should have explained to you why I had to undo your edits again, but I have been very busy, and I do struggle to find the time to correct your edits every time and issue more explanations. I understand that not all privateers were Animi avatars; that's a no brainer.
The reason why I undid your edit is because to make the proper transitions, we needed to move that page to "Privateer (Animus avatar)" and create a new page for the occupation, whose title should only be "Privateer", not "Privateer (occupation)". We have precise rules regarding how pages sharing the same name should be titled, and this is detailed in our manual of style. However, I didn't have the time to make the complete transition, so I had to only undo your edit in the meantime. Part of the reason why it would take me extra time to make all the changes is because the disambiguating term "Animi Avatar" across all our pages on Animus avatars is grammatically incorrect, particularly in regards to capitalization, so I would need to move all pages on Animi avatars to the proper term when I get around to this.
Now, you have moved the pages and undone my corrections yet again after one of our mods made it clear to you to talk about it one the talk page first.
I know that you mean well, but your edits have been constantly very disruptive and stress-inducing to clean-up, so I would ask you for future reference to please refrain from moving pages, modifying categories, changing the infobox of articles, or making any other formatting changes again and stick to only writing. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 04:50, June 29, 2020 (UTC)
Just to add, moving pages around recklessly can result in extreme mix-ups and destruction in edit histories across multiple pages which are very difficult to resolve. You should not be moving any pages at all. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 04:58, June 29, 2020 (UTC)
In this wiki, all article names, with precious few exceptions, should be singular. Thus your change of Mayan stele to Mayan stelae goes against the MoS. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Sadelyrate (siniath) 17:27, July 1, 2020 (UTC)
RE:Policies vs Gaming info
I didn't redirect any pages. I separated them, but the way you had done this was incorrect. The article for "Privateer (occupation)" should just be named "Privateer" because the word privateer normally refers to the occupation anyways. There's no need to clarify it. On the other hand, "Privateer (Animus avatar)" should properly have that clarifying term in parentheses. This is explained in our MoS on disambiguation.
In regards to Mayan stele, I had asked you a few days ago to please refrain from moving any more pages because you are doing this recklessly without understanding our guidelines in our MoS. I also don't appreciate you making incorrect claims about what the MoS tells you to do, like "adding false information". The MoS does not tell anyone to do that, and it's clear that you don't understand it or have not read it.
While I continue to see your edits as being made in earnest faith, I can't continue tolerating these disruptive edits. As I said, moving pages recklessly has the potential to cause a lot of damage because it can break pages. You also must learn to source every new article you create rather than writing only one line.
If you try to move yet another page when it was not right of you to do so, or if you persist in creating articles without providing any sources, I will give you another warning. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 20:19, July 1, 2020 (UTC)
I have already asked you to refrain from modifying infoboxes any further in addition to creating any more pages without proper sourcing and moving pages. Your last chain of edits across multiple infoboxes was once again, disruptive and without reason. We can't keep on tolerating this. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 23:34, July 4, 2020 (UTC)