Assassin's Creed Wiki
Advertisement
Assassin's Creed Wiki
Aclogo.png

Welcome to the Order, Kulurak!

Welcome to the Assassin's Creed Wiki!
We hope you enjoy your stay, and we look forward to working with you!
Have you something to say?
  • You can always ask our beloved administrators!
  • Our local staff members can always lend a hand!
  • You can also visit the wiki's community portal!
  • We also have the Discord if you're ever in the mood for a chat!
  • There is also our forums, where all users can help you out.
  • You can also check out the blogs, where you and other contributors can voice out your opinion.
Knights.png

We seek unity, stability and order.
  • Not sure where to start?
    • You can always help out by sharing what you know on some of our stubs.
    • Got some useful pictures? Share them with us on these articles.
    • Got a useful concept for an article? Why not help out in some articles in need of a revamp?
  • Always remember to sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~) to avoid any confusion between users.
  • You can also refer to the wiki's help pages if you're ever in doubt.
  • Please remember to read our wiki policies to avoid gaining any unnecessary attention.
We wish you safety and peace on your future endeavors.
Happy Editing!


Feel free to contact me on my talkpage if you need anything. DarkFeather (talk) 14:58, November 21, 2015 (UTC)

Image sourcing

Hey Kulurak!

Thanks for uploading the covers for AC: Uprising. I wanted to inform you of two things, however. While the sourcing itself is correct, you're listing the summary and the licensing twice. As well as this, while there's nothing wrong with using Access the Animus as a source, try looking for the original source and get the images from there cause Facebook has a negative effect on image quality. Thanks for reading :) Crook The Constantine District 16:34, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

Sure, i will take it into account for future uploads. Sry Kulurak (talk) 17:26, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

Origins Weapons

Hey Kulurak, just saw your edit on the weapons page and that will be really helpful. If possible, could you also get the stats of those common or rare swords at level 40? I will start on getting those myself as well, so we could do this fast. Thanks alot! XOdeyssusx (talk) 01:39, November 18, 2017 (UTC)

I had Aya glitch mission happend to me, so i have over 9 000 000 drachmas, so money is not problem for me (spend over 2 millions on reda chests). But i have just (yesterday before i discovered your sandbox with weapons) sold over 150 rare/common items (kept only legendaries), so i no longer have them, that include some quest rewards (but still have about 40 side quests remaining so if anything will be rewardedd to me, i will add them too). So i will only be able to add all legendaries (including dlcs)  + that common/rare that drop to me now. + i have over half of weapons from helix store also, so i will be able to get these stats too. But i think i wont be able to play much this week, it will be busy for me, but next week i will try to add everything i have. Kulurak (talk) 08:21, November 18, 2017 (UTC)
No worries man. There's no need to rush and add all everything at once. You can just do those at your own free time :) XOdeyssusx (talk) 12:55, November 18, 2017 (UTC)
I see that you saw that Reddit post too with weapons, so now we are just missing 6 weapons as far as i know (Harlequin & Chop-Chop from Ubi Club, 3 items from Mercenary Pack content + "calamity blade" from season pass (i have it at level 40) + stats to missing ones(i have some of them so will add them (like "The Fang" or like i said "calamity blade"), + i see we have wrong damage for Mustapha's Blade, it does not do 440, but 404). Kulurak (talk) 08:07, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, I took some of the data from the post, but based on what I've seen, there's a possibly that the stats vary and may not be the same for everyone, thus the difference in the dmg for some of the weapons.
Stats in damage are little bit different, because it apply "Master Warrior" (Passive ability. Increase the damage of all your melee attack by 1%. This can be acquired multiple times.) damage buff to damage from skill tree, so it depends how many points everybody have in this skill, that makes that small/big dfference.Kulurak (talk) 17:55, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

Deleted banner

Why did you delete the merge banner on the AC series article? Lacrossedeamon (talk) 09:39, December 7, 2018 (UTC)

Moving pages when obstructed

I noticed that you attempted to move "Kō Risa" to "Lisa Huang" manually by exchanging the content in their pages. I assume that you did this after failing to move "Kō Risa" directly because the page "Lisa Huang" already exists. When this occurs, the only way you can conduct the move is to contact an administrator who has the ability to delete the destination page to make way for the move.

It is strictly forbidden to move pages manually by merely switching their content. This isn't an actual move. The pages remain as they are in the system, only they have been edited in such a way that they reflect one another's pages prior to the edits. In this example, the talk page for "Lisa Huang" would have remained with the page "Kō Risa" which has now become a redirect. Notwithstanding this, all the history for the page would only be visible if one visits the redirect page. When moving a page, we have to make sure that the history and talk pages are preserved, i.e. they move with the page which only happens with an actual system rename of the page. Apart from this, the sheer fact of pages being moved in an inconsistent manner would also be problematic.

I know that you meant no harm, and no permanent harm was done because I caught this early. It is a common mistake when editors are stumped for how to move a page where they are obstructed. So I am just explaining this to you for future reference. :) Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 19:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, i apologise for this mistake, i wanted to move it, but i should let you know like you said, so you can move it. I totally forgot about what would happen with talk page. --Kulurak (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

ACVMemories template

Oh whoops I could I mistake those for having the same name O.o Thanks for correcting it! Kennyannydenny (talk) 19:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Organizing special chapters in Dynasty

Hey Kulurak, I noticed that you removed the special chapters of Dynasty from their respective volumes again after Blue-castle reaffirmed that they are not in the French publications. While I acknowledge that that is the case, I reverted them again and thought it'd best that I give a clearer explanation as to why, so that we might also think of alternative solutions.

By now we can infer that the special chapters will never be translated and released in other languages. It's not impossible, but it's quite unlikely. We might anticipate that maybe someday they will release a special volume bundling all of them together, but I think that is too speculative at this time to act on. As far as we know, the scenario is that these special chapters are part of the respective volumes they are listed under, but they have been omitted from the French publication. This is different from treating them as entirely separate chapters which do not belong with the volumes they are actually listed under.

My concern is that when you removed the Special 1 from the page "Assassin's Creed: Dynasty Volume 1" and Special 2 from "Assassin's Creed: Dynasty Volume 2", then where will they go? For organization purposes, it does not make sense for them to be wholly absent from these respective volume pages. The full title of the first special is "Volume 1: Flower Capital Assassin – Historical Background Explanation" while the full title of the second special is "Volume 2 Extra Content". The former gives detail background information about the story in volume 1 and the latter has bonus, funny comic strips relating to the story in volume 2.

Notwithstanding this, but creating a whole section in the main "Assassin's Creed: Dynasty" page titled "Chapters not yet in volumes" is just jarringly awkward. It is clear from the content and titles of the specials that they are part of the volumes they are named under, even if they have been omitted in the French publication. More importantly, it suggests that this is a temporary section and that we expect the volumes to eventually be re-compiled in some other volume, which is not the case. Our expectation (or at least my expectation) is that they will never be released in French (or even in English) due to the challenges with translation—much of the Volume 1 special utilizes excerpts from centuries-old texts written in Classical Chinese that can only be translated by experts. Even if we wish to avoid misleading readers that the special chapters are in the French publication, this is not the right way to do it. For example, we can keep them organized in the volumes list but give asterisks noting that they are absent in the French editions. This might not be the best solution, but it is better than the awkward organization of "chapters not yet in volumes".

I understand that you said before that the series has never been released in trade paperback in Chinese, so the French is the best we can go on, but we also need to recognize that this does not mean the French edition is the most authoritative source on how the series is organized and being written and what its content is. Its inability to have translated and published certain chapters does not mean that those chapters are rendered into oblivion and do not belong where they have originally been written to accompany.

In any case, I return to the question: supposing that we were to excise the special chapters from their respective volumes, then where would they go? How would we organize them? Having them floating around doesn't make sense to me. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 22:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cyf, totally understand why you reverted it, and i agree, that they should be just floting there alone. I just wanted it to reflect truth so it does not confuse people that we are stating incorrect info that they are part of Volume, but they cant find it in their copy. It is shame they havent relesed collected Volumes in China including Specials, that would make it more easy and clear :( Ok, so we will just let them "inside" of Volumes like we had until now. --Kulurak (talk) 05:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)