Welcome to the Order, A.gao.96!
Welcome to the Assassin's Creed Wiki!
We hope you enjoy your stay, and we look forward to working with you!
|Have you something to say?|
We seek unity, stability and order.
|We wish you safety and peace on your future endeavors.|
Please note that you need to source any and all images you upload to the wiki in accordance to our image policy. For more information on how to source images, check this page. Also check the information about naming images appropriately. Badly named or unsourced images will be deleted. Feel free to reupload your deleted image with proper sourcing. Thank you. Stormbeast ♉ The Helpful Place 16:39, November 13, 2014 (UTC)
Hello there. Just shooting you this quick message to point out that Wikia has a preview button (right above the publish-button) when in the editor. By using this, you don't have to make lots of small edits (like you did adding the images to the Guards gallery). Please make all your edits in one go, so we won't have to warn/block you for badge hunting. Thanks! :) Amnestyyy (Contact me!)
Page moves and moves back
I was just curious about your thought process in your recent moving of the pages Australian Brotherhood of Assassins and Babylonian Brotherhood of Assassins to "Australian Assassins" and "Babylonian Assassins" then back. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 15:51, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
I'm gonna have to ask you to stop these edits you have been carrying out on Templar articles because they don't seem to serve any point. Linking to both Templars (in general) and the specific rite seems more efficient to me than linking to just the Rite, especially since you don't add in the Templars link anywhere else in the articles.
Please refrain from adding information from AC: Origins (such as death dates) until the game officially releases (the 27nd, aka this Friday). We are trying to keep spoilers on the wiki to a minimum for the moment. If you keep adding spoilers, I might have to temporarily block you. Crook The Constantine District 09:09, October 25, 2017 (UTC)
Agao, before you contest a page move, can you please take it to a discussion instead or at the very least explain in your edit summary why it is that you did so?
Perhaps I should've explained it more clearly in my own edit summary rather than just saying "per discussion", but because of the retcon from Origins as to when the Assassin Brotherhood was founded, we have reason to believe that the Babylonian Brotherhood, predating Origins, was not called the Babylonian Brotherhood of Assassins in its time. However, we have decided to retain it because The Essential Guide calling it the "Babylonian Brotherhood" (Note: without the "of Assassins") does not necessarily contradict the retcon if it can be taken to be a retroactive name applied by later Assassins. However, given the ambiguously canonical nature of the name now, we felt it best to use exactly what is given in the source "Babylonian Brotherhood" rather than the name "Babylonian Brotherhood of Assassins" as we extrapolated for the other names based on the official naming convention. After all, the reasoning for retaining the name is that it is a sourced name even in spite of it predating the Assassins. It's a compromise. I know this is confusing, so I apologize, but when you can reasonably expect that a move has been made due to a discussion as my edit summary indicated, please be considerate of that and not be so hasty. Take it to a discussion first. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 01:22, November 2, 2017 (UTC)
Order of the Ancients
A.gao.96, this is the third time I've had to revert your edit to the Order of the Ancients membership list; I've told you where the information calling Caesar a member of the Order (as opposed to merely an ally) comes from and yet you've changed it yet again? Can you please explain why you're so insistent on this despite being given a source for the change? --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 09:36, February 6, 2018 (UTC)
- Agao was trying to correct the category usage, but he didn't know that we had a discussion and decided that categories should follow the format "English people", "Welsh people", etc. not "Englishmen", "Welshmen", etc. as it formerly was. To be fair, we have only gotten around to half-implementing this, so the confusion is perfectly understandable. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 10:38, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
Sure, you can delete Kuomintang category. A.gao.96 18:18, November 3, 2018 (UTC)