Paris?
Isn't it the "French Rite"? It has to be bigger than just Paris and Versailles.--Bovkaffe (talk) 17:52, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Nope. It's explicitly called the "Parisian Rite" in the Database. There's no mention of this Rite's actions, or those of other Templars throughout the rest of France. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 17:56, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
Misinterpretation of the name
I think the "Parisian Rite of the Templar Order" is the name with the French Templars of the country and not just in the capital. No evidence of other templars rites in France. Also in the novel it shows that the Parisian rite is a state power.
Spanish assassin (Talk) 18:50, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
In the french version ther is no "Parisian Rite", or just "Rite", there are called "Templars" or "Templar Order".
Linkpogo, Pater Intellectus 19:50, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- They're called, in-game, the "Paris Rite"; it's quite hard to misinterpret that. The article doesn't touch upon whether or not the Templars have other Rites in the country, because we don't know if they do or not. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 07:39, October 22, 2015 (UTC)
Revamp
After doing what was just a simple spelling/grammar check of the entire article, I have to say that it desperately needs an almost complete revamp. The content is almost entirely just a hazardous listing of events in Unity corresponding to these Templars. There's no flow to the article, a lot of lack of clarity here and there, and nothing to connect all this information to the larger topic: that of this organization and its motives and goals. Explanation of the schism should also be clearer... I would need to look at it again to be more clear about what needs to be done, but I hadn't meant to spend time on this article as I'm too busy at the moment, and in terms of Assassin's Creed work, this is aside from my current tasks. However, I was admittedly beyond stressed at the condition of this article and the sheer amount of grammar/spelling errors that took over an hour to correct. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 15:45, February 5, 2017 (UTC)
- An hour or two ago, Crook told me that he was going to have a look at this article. I'm sure he'll fix it up just fine. If, afterwards, there are still concerns, we'll just have to have another look at it. --Amnestyyy (Contact me!) 16:16, February 5, 2017 (UTC)