Talk: Cultists of Kosmos

This is the discussion page for Category:Cultists of Kosmos.
Here, you may discuss improving the article.
To discuss the subject itself, use the Forums.

Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.

Be polite
Assume good faith
Do not insult other people

Adepts of Kosmos

They are also called this which might be a better cat name in order to distinguish them from the regular henchmen. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 05:43, January 23, 2019 (UTC)

If we're going to have this category it would be better to call it "Members of the Cult of Kosmos," since we're going to have to create counterpart categories for every other organisation and we'll need to maintain a level of consistency in naming format. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 09:25, January 23, 2019 (UTC)

To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". Sol Pacificus^(Cyfiero) 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. Sol Pacificus^(Cyfiero) 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

I agree with getting more input on the issue. I also understand that the "members of ..." format is unwieldy but like having a set standard with no exceptions if possible. I don’t agree with doing away with assassins as an occupational capacity unless a sufficient synonym can be found to replace it. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 22:23, October 16, 2019 (UTC)