 |
Assassin's Creed Rogue: Weapons[]
I would like to know why the article which i created is unnecessary. It only gives people Info. about the weapons used in the game
Jayam (talk) 15:03, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
In time, all of the weapons will get their own articles, and will be added to the pages for the different weapon types.--Bovkaffe (talk) 15:28, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
Assassin's Creed Victory was leaked a few hours ago
- First, more than 24 hours ago. That's not "few". Second, keyword - "leaked". As in not announced officially. We don't deal in leaks here. --Kainzorus Prime ⚜ Walkie-talkie 22:13, December 3, 2014 (UTC)
Orthodox Church[]
Having reworked it to focus more on the series, I don't think it's irrelevant anymore. Makao the Byzantine {T/\L|<} 16:45, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
The page comprises of one sole instance for its entire history. It should be deleted now and restored further down the line if it does ever get another mention, unless you can discover one before it goes. Slate Vesper (talk) 01:22, December 18, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Timeline[]
Considering there was an agreement (quite some time ago, now) to remove these navboxes, and also considering the fact that this template is largely redundant. I propose we go about deleting this article. It's not needed, and is open to even the most insignificant event arguably deserving a place, which will just make the thing bloat uncontrollably.--Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 12:18, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
How is it 'redundant'? And there never was an agreement to remove all navboxes. -- Master Sima Yi Talk 19:26, February 9, 2015 (UTC)
SoulCalibur V[]
Is it described as canon (so far as Ezio's parts go)? If so, then the article should remain. If not, then I support deletion. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 12:37, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
I don't think we consider it canon. It only has a trivia point in some of the articles. I doubt SoulCalibur would be considered canon for characters like Kratos and Darth Vader either.--Bovkaffe (talk) 12:53, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to formally object to this page being deleted wholesale, without at least incorporating part of it into the Ezio article, (under the Soulcalibur V header in Trivia, of course). I get that it's not canon in the least, don't get me wrong, but we'd be getting rid of information that is related to the franchise (to a character in the franchise).
At the very least we could link to Ezio's article in the Soulcalibur wiki. --Zero-ELEC (talk) 22:26, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
- The plot reads very silly - I wouldn't be opposed to putting some of the info in trivia though. How would we link to the Soulcalibur article? External link? Crook The Constantine District 22:30, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
- An Interwiki link would work, something like this: "Soulcalibur Wiki: Ezio Auditore da Firenze". --Zero-ELEC (talk) 22:41, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
Assassin's Creed: Victory[]
I would love to know the reason the article I wrote Assassin's Creed: Victory is a candidate for deletion. The game has been leaked, ill give it that, but Ubisoft themselves confirmed the game is real and coming out next year. We should also be a target site for people wanting to hear about he game than other websites who will get the news first. Please hear me out and save Victory! -VladAssassin 16:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
This is a wiki, so it's not our job to provide news about leaked games. Which also means we don't compete with other sites for attention.--Bovkaffe (talk) 16:39, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
Vendetta and PS Home Content[]
Don't be too quick to delete; perhaps this could be rolled into a larger stub about PS Home content or "PS Home Abstergo Labs" Jasonnorthrup (talk) 18:40, December 31, 2014 (UTC)
I think they ought to be here for the sake of posterity and completeness; is there somewhere else they would fit better? Jasonnorthrup (talk) 00:18, January 2, 2015 (UTC)
Assassin's Creed: Comet[]
I'd like to formally oppose this deletion, since it's most definitely not an unnecessary redirect. The game itself is still referred to internally as ACC, and various in-game assets are referred to as "Comet". Additionally, if someone where to search on this wiki for Assassin's Creed: Comet, looking for the old production name for a game, they would not find the finished game, given that the Rogue article doesn't even have a single mention of that (even under development). This redirect is there for accessibility, and doesn't clutter or impede anything. --Zero-ELEC (talk) 22:13, May 7, 2015 (UTC) [Edited 04:29, May 9, 2015 (UTC)]
- While there is no harm in having it, there's also no benefit in having it either. Most people are going to search for it as "Rogue" because that's the commercial release title. And besides, all that can be done to resolve this is to make a trivia point mentioning that its internal title was Comet, which can still be seen in some conceptual documents. Slate Vesper (talk) 06:02, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
Connor's death[]
Hey I made a page caled Connor Kenway/Ratonhnhake:ton's Death but then it said they're gonna delete it because we don't know how he died but we do know how he died. It's in Assassin's Creed Rogue Abstergo files and I have a picture of it (Duh Assassin (talk) 15:11, August 22, 2015 (UTC)).
- The only thing the Rogue Abstergo files tell us about Connor's death is that it was "a mess". And seeing as that came from Melanie, a Templar, that is not the most reliable statement ever. Regardless, it's not worth creating an article for it :/ If we knew something about Connor's death, it would go on his article anyway. Crook The Constantine District 15:14, August 22, 2015 (UTC)
Buckingham[]
Since this "borough" has been removed from the source cited on the article, and the fact that the region around Buckingham Palace is actually a part of the City of Westminster (which is included on the cited source), I see no reason as to why this article should exist. If the series visits the town of Buckingham at some point, then the article can be re-created. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 09:11, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Fair points, sorry for being too hasty with the removal of the deletion template. I'll get rid of the article then, if that's cool with everyone? Crook The Constantine District 15:32, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
List of Characters[]
Why is this marked for deletion? It is a list of notable characters in the Series, which was not available on the Wikia before now. Yes, it does need updating and editing. But, when people researching the Series have looked for a list of characters, they could not find it. I have taken that into consideration before posting the article. BlackHawksChild (talk) 21:24, May 14, 2016 (UTC)BlackHawksChild
Regarding Assassin's Creed: Origins and Bayek, guys are you serious, we know enough although it hasn't been comfirmed by ubisoft themselves we know what the next Assassin's Creed is going to be like. Don't be all like: Ubisoft didn't confirm this, Ubisoft didn't confirm that we now have the pages setup so they can be edited when we know more (which is literally in 2 days time). Please remove the watermarks. Merijnj (talk) 20:53, June 10, 2017 (UTC)Merijnj
Assassin's Creed: Origins and Bayek[]
Guys seriously stop with the: Ubisoft didn't confirm it stuff. We know enough to start a page, and when we know more we edit it completely and correctly (BTW we know more in 2 days time). Literally just remove the watermark. Merijnj (talk) 20:56, June 10, 2017 (UTC)Merijnj
- I'm adding the tags as a matter of procedure and respect to guidelines. I personally think that integrity does matter, so that even if we're 99% certain of the veracity of something, we shouldn't add it if it's not properly sourced. Otherwise, it sets a precedent for people to argue that even if something isn't accurately sourced, suspicion that it is true nonetheless is cause for the material to remain. In any case, it is a bit moot since Ubisoft will announce it soon. If the articles are deleted, they can be restored at any time anyways once everything is confirmed. If not, well, we got a head-start. I just want to give a reminder that we should still respect proper sourcing. Also your article of Medjay cannot stand as just content copied from Wikipedia. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 00:47, June 11, 2017 (UTC)
Misthios[]
I've given my reasons more fully here, but for ease of reference I shall state I believe the articles were split far too early and that we're making an erroneous assumption that Kassandra is the canon Misthios. Far from deleting this article, I believe it should be returned to it's function as a primary article over Kassandra and Alexios upuntil the release of Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 08:21, July 16, 2018 (UTC)
Cyrenians vs. Cyreneans[]
Both Wiktionary and Free Dictionary agree that the term in 'Cyrenian', not 'Cyrenean'. That's why I used 'Cyrenian'.Sadelyrate (siniath) 05:47, September 18, 2018 (UTC)
Death of Cleopatra[]
I figured since its an article on Wikipedia it'd be good enough for here. Also it was listed in 'Events' in the AC Origins comic navbox, that why I made the page. If you don't think it's needed, feel free to delete.Boofhead185 (talk) 14:28, October 17, 2018 (UTC)
I don't see what's wrong with the page about the Olympians.TDalyyyy1998 (talk) 22:48, November 6, 2018 (UTC)
Randomized Mercenary[]
You shouldn't delete this page because even though she is a random mercenary Klymene doesn't go by any other name or title like all the other random mercenaries, oh and the same goes for Nora the Snow Leopard. She even seems very popular because there are five videos of the player going after her on Youtube and I was able to find some images of her. So please don't delete this page. Frontierchris (talk) 02:12, January 15, 2019 (UTC)
- This ain't a popularity contest. If the mercenary is confirmed to be unique (e.g. The False Leonidas or plays a part in the story (e.g. Talos the Stone-Fist, Sostratos), then an article can be created and expanded for them. It's also important to note "the Snow Leopard" or "the Beautiful Justice" is simply a title or trait, meaning other mercenaries may share this same title. XOdeyssusx (talk) 02:26, January 15, 2019 (UTC)
- There are no other mercenaries who share the titles "the Snow Leopard" or "the Beautiful Justice." Trust me I've looked them up and all I could find were those two. That's what I meant by name changed. —unsigned comment by Frontierchris (talk · contr) 02:33, 15 January 2019 (edit)
- Then I suppose the articles can remain, but they need to be revamped and rewritten. And a note when you create the articles, we have a policy on layout and format of the content, which I highly encourage you to read here. Also, the images you uploaded, as you indicate earlier, were taken from content from other players. Please remember to name the images correctly and properly source them from where they were taken (Youtube in this case). Here is a policy on this. You can change check other images on the wikia and see how they are sourced. XOdeyssusx (talk) 02:47, January 15, 2019 (UTC)
I understand, the truth is I've been opening new pages a number of new pages on Red Dead Wiki and I must tell it is very different. For instance the new pages already have boxes to place images as well as the information below them. Oh and by the way, about Zoe the Cyclops Slayer, I've looked her up and it would seem that there are a few other mercenaries who share the same title. Oh and one more thing, there's also this one random mercenary with the title "The Flash," it's the same character with the same biography but they keep giving her a different name like Elpis, Berenike, Ilona, or Zona. Does that sound strange to you?
- That's the randomness at work. The title 'The Flash' just means they drop a specific gear piece. Also, sign your posts with four tildes, these wavy lines ~. Sadelyrate (siniath) 16:52, January 15, 2019 (UTC)
Hagia Irene[]
Hagia Irene has been marked for deletion. I'm pretty against that idea. As that is the article from 2011, and the other is from 2018, the newer one should be deleted and the older one renamed. To make sure as much history of the page is kept as possible. Kennyannydenny (talk) 10:27, June 5, 2019 (UTC)
The 2018 article used information from the database of the game, not from Wikipedia, it's why I considered it's more relevant~.Francesco75 (talk) 11:10, June 5, 2019 (UTC)
- You are both right :). The history of the page should be preserved as much as possible, and for this reason, the older article should be kept. However, that the newer page appropriately draws information from the database not Wikipedia means that its content takes precedence. Therefore, the content of the newer page should be moved to the older page before the newer page is deleted. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 12:07, June 5, 2019 (UTC)
Isu Authority in Eden[]
This page has been marked for deletion because the isu being described there is "Not an Individual". I don't agree with it.
Many are the Isu that has been mentioned and they haven't appeared until this day: Eris, Hebe, Horus, Iris, etc. As the Isu Codex states, an Isu being in charge of the city exists and it's an individual or at least one person.
The body of the article can be modified because it speaks more of the project and their participation than the isu themselves, but I think it's important to mention them. I honestly don't really see a reason for not doing it. I'd like to know the reasons to delete it.
Cristophorus35 (talk) 21:38, July 24, 2019 (UTC)
Lisa Huang[]
I have to figure out that the family name of the character in Chinese character(kanji) is "黄". It pronounces Huáng in Chinese Mandarin, Hwang in Cantonese, Kou in Japanese. Her name can't be Lisa Yang in English.
ACCh_screenshot_1
Screenshot via Sunday GX official free demo.
关云 (talk) 14:19, April 28, 2020 (UTC)
- Please add that to the Lisa Yang talk page I started. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 14:24, April 28, 2020 (UTC)
Mind-controlled humans[]
I just don't know why you want to delete it? GodGamer GodConsole 16:10, June 25, 2020 (UTC)
- Unless we get a canon name for the idea I find the need for such an article lacking. The content in within the article was also not in line with our MOS and fits in better in other articles. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 07:13, June 26, 2020 (UTC)
Templars[]
The reason why I added (https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/wiki/The_Templars) is because I only wish to add more insight into Templar ideals. I tried to be unbiased and only show the truth into the article. It says that the reason for deletion is "redundant" but in the official description of the Templars I noticed that there isn't much to suggest what the Templars' belief system is. If there is in my opinion, I don't feel that it explains enough. This article I wrote is more of an extension to give more depth into it. I noticed that the Assassins have a dedicated in depth and lengthy explanation to their way of life while the Templars only have but a single paragrapgh on theirs as evidenced by "goals" and "views on humanity". One might argue that it already conveys the meaning despite its short length. I suppose, but like I've said my aim is simply to add some more explanations. Not to embellish or degrade in any way. – Xjsjsj (talk) 15:58, July 26, 2020 (UTC)
- If you think that the "Templars" article is missing information, then you expand on it rather than create another article with a similar title which would create disorganization and confusion by its redundancy. However, I should point out that the content of the article you wrote also doesn't meet our standards because it is written like one's personal opinions rather than documenting lore facts. Sol Pacificus(Cyfiero) 16:10, July 26, 2020 (UTC)
Deletion of "Template:Location Infobox (AC Black Flag/Rogue)"[]
I'm not sure why this is being deleted. It's not a replacement for the existing Location Infobox template, but another option with expanded categories. The existing template is incredibly basic, and forces information on subjects such as location coordinates, collectibles and available activities into the main body of an article, bloating it unnecessarily.
Macmanius (talk) 01:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Range of memory pages like Ymir's Altar (memory), Thor (memory) and Oxenefordscire (Fly Agaric)[]
Definitely disagree with removing these pages. We've had several pages for Assassin's Creed: Origins for years on this wiki, like the individual Stone Circle pages, Papyrus Puzzles like Dead or Alive. Don't forget the Ainigmata Ostraka for AC Odyssey. I have no idea why we would suddenly handle this kind of memories differently in AC Valhalla and Lacrossedeamon hasn't provided any reason to why this would be. Unlike the Ainigmata Ostraka and Payprus Puzzles, most of these memories have actual unique dialogue which could really clutter a page when put unto one.
We could just name the articles Ymir's Altar (without the memory, putting info of the memory and location on one page) but i'm definitely against simply deleting this. If we would delete this, we'll need to do that too with the Origins and Odyssey pages. Kennyannydenny (talk) 11:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- We are currently reviewing how we want to treat these pages. Many of the these act like the Mayan Stelae or Indian Totems from Black Flag/Rogue which we do not treat as individual memories. Right now we want to treat only quests and world events (not the other Mysteries locations) as memories. We also plan to revisit Origins and Odyssey, possibly coming up with a template for non memory activities. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- If that is the case, I'd still say do not delete them (yet). Deleting them now would be a hastily decision on something that hasn't been set in stone. If it is decided all these pages for all three games needs deleting, ok. But don't just go delete the Valhalla ones whilst the Origins and Odyssey pages can keep existing, that's like applying double standards. Anyhow, with their unique dialogues and background info (which, in my honest opinion, does make it more like a Stone Circle and a memory than just a Mayan Stelae), it would be weird to not feature them on the wiki. Kennyannydenny (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not that it matters much, but we can delete all the Papyrus Puzzle and Ainigmata Ostraka memory pages at any given time, their content is already archived in their respective pages. - Soranin (talk) 18:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- If that is the case, I'd still say do not delete them (yet). Deleting them now would be a hastily decision on something that hasn't been set in stone. If it is decided all these pages for all three games needs deleting, ok. But don't just go delete the Valhalla ones whilst the Origins and Odyssey pages can keep existing, that's like applying double standards. Anyhow, with their unique dialogues and background info (which, in my honest opinion, does make it more like a Stone Circle and a memory than just a Mayan Stelae), it would be weird to not feature them on the wiki. Kennyannydenny (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Upon further look, it seems that the Standing Stones and Offering Altars lack unique dialogue, with the former having random lines spouted by Eivor and the latter having no dialogue, apart from Cedd's Stone which is just the start of the Green Children of Anglia quest. Some of the Fly Agaric scenes have no dialogue (Eurviscire, Hamtunscire, Hordafylke, Lincolnscire, Snotinghamscire and Suthsexe, so 6 out of 15). Another 7 only have a single line of dialogue spoken by Eivor and 2 also have a note nearby (Rygjafylke and Sciropescire). Though I admit I'm yet to check if the lines are tied to location or randomized between them. The Legendary Animals memories also seem to lack any dialogue but I haven't seen through them all yet, so I'll update accordingly.
- So far my vote is against the creation of memory pages for the Legendary Animals, Fly Agaric, Offering Altars and Standing Stones. My vote is in favor of creating memory pages for the flyting encounters. - Soranin (talk) 15:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Update, as promised. The lines from Fly Agaric are unique to each location and the Legendary Animals do lack any unique dialogue. My original votes stand.
- To not be accused of having double standards, I will also leave here my votes for Origins and Odysseys' activities/memories. Tombs and Ancient Mechanisms section from Origins and its equivalent in Odyssey (Tombs and Ancient Stelae) should be removed from the Memories template and their pages kept, for they are location pages. Papyrus Puzzles and Ainigmata Ostraka should be removed and their memory pages deleted. - Soranin (talk) 16:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- What about the cairns? I know they have unique dialogue. The one in Asgard has Odin talking with his two brothers Vili and Ve, that definitely wasn't random. Other cairns are often about Eivor's childhood which could also be valuable information. Kennyannydenny (talk) 18:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- The Cairns are a mess, tbh. That one for Asgard is fine, it seems consistent. But like, I've seen Rosta's scene (where she teaches Eivor about the cairns) on no less than 3 different ones: Rogaland, Vinland and Jotunheim! I don't know if this was intended or not, but points to the fact they are not specific, apart from the one at Asgard. - Soranin (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- So the dialogue isn't tied per location? Maybe it's better to add to the cairn page itself then. I just did the cairn in Jotunheim, no dialogue at all. Which is a first for me in my game. Kennyannydenny (talk) 20:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- The Cairns are a mess, tbh. That one for Asgard is fine, it seems consistent. But like, I've seen Rosta's scene (where she teaches Eivor about the cairns) on no less than 3 different ones: Rogaland, Vinland and Jotunheim! I don't know if this was intended or not, but points to the fact they are not specific, apart from the one at Asgard. - Soranin (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- What about the cairns? I know they have unique dialogue. The one in Asgard has Odin talking with his two brothers Vili and Ve, that definitely wasn't random. Other cairns are often about Eivor's childhood which could also be valuable information. Kennyannydenny (talk) 18:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Anyhow, if we are not to make separate pages for the memory and location, can't we just rename the current memory pages to remove the (memory) part and rewrite it to be a location page? Instead of simply deleting and then creating a page for the location. Like Cedd's Stone for example, that can really easy be remade into a location article instead of a memory one. Kennyannydenny (talk) 11:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- My vote is for any dialogue for these types of activities to just go to the Floating conversations page. For note, the individual stone circle memories are supposed to be deleted since Bayek's Promise is the actual memory they fall under (except the planetarium, sobek, and ankh which need to be addressed). Yes the currently proposed delete pages could be reworked into location pages I'm just not tracking if some of those already have the location pages. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 14:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- The only altar that has a location page is one without a memory page, Saint Leonard's Altar. No standing stones have memory pages, neither do the Cairns. - Soranin (talk) 15:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- My vote is for any dialogue for these types of activities to just go to the Floating conversations page. For note, the individual stone circle memories are supposed to be deleted since Bayek's Promise is the actual memory they fall under (except the planetarium, sobek, and ankh which need to be addressed). Yes the currently proposed delete pages could be reworked into location pages I'm just not tracking if some of those already have the location pages. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 14:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Assassin's Creed Valhalla - Developer Credits[]
I would like to know why the development team can't be added to the fandom site, since they made the game. A dedicated spot for the whole team would be nice to have here, and since there are already sites, like Mobygames, that document them, they can easily be rechecked and corrected. Merkre23 (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Since there are already sites that document it, I fail to see why it's also needed that they documented here in the wiki, which is meant to be an encyclopedia of Assassin's Creed lore. - Soranin (talk) 20:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
@Soranin Valid point, but I see various persons that are added to this very "lore" forum, like composers and voice over artists. So instead of picking which one are featured, a general post showcasing everyone can't hurt nobody. If those pages that I'm talking about are in the queue to be deleted as well, my apologies, that's fair. If not, my point stands. Merkre23 (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Hrothgar (Zealot) redirect[]
The page formerly named as "Hrothgar (Zealot)" now just "Hrothgar" should be reverted as there is another character named Hrothgar in the Beowulf DLC who doesn't yet have a page. V i l k a T h e W o l f (talk) 11:42, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Veil[]
I wrote about the world that, after taking the potion, Eivor enters in the festivals of Oscoria (veil). Why do they want to remove it?
I'm writing through Google translator.012345678901111aaaa (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- See talk:Veil – BearticWiki (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)