No. China and japan are not the same man. If they wanted to give people a game set in feudal japan they would have. Ubisoft didn't even devolope the chronicles series they just published them.
They never said anything about ancient egypt being a bad setting for egypt. Everybody wanted it, even the devolopers. So we got it.
The artwork is just from site that ubisoft Montreal employee happens to be a member of. It's just concept art from an employee nothing more. Yes someday there migh he a game in feudal japan. I thinkmthat wouldmhe great, but i don't think this means anything. Some of the devolopers have said the past they htought it was the worst place to set an ac game. I disagree with them. Don't get you hopes up.
TheBrightLord1, You asked what every one thought of aya. He answered the question. I hated that too. All that prep too finish the game as aya.
Technically humans were created to be controlled by apples of eden. The peices of eden were not created to specifically enslave humanity. They did use the apples to control humanity but that is not why the were created. Humans were evolved to be controlled by the apples, but most likely they already had the apples. Eventually the isu wanted to apples to will the solar flare away with some sort of physic sheild but it didn't work. All the peices of eden might even have exist before humanity's forced evolution. The isu were around alot longer than humans. The shrouds heal mortal wounds of the isu even. My piont is their only purpose was not to control humanity. Humanity most likely wasn't even around for much isu history. So saying that the peices of eden were all created to enslave humanity is not completly correct. The apple may hav been but they too have another purpose which could have been used befor humanity's forced evolution. Apple also contain large amount of information like a data storage device. The thing is we really don't why or when they were originally created.
We all know that. She mainly wanted to know about the temples.
Jrod is just trying to defend me me because of one person on here that you remind all of. He had made several accounts and always find a way to try and get under my skin. Every time he get banned he creates a new account.
No problem, They specifically altered our history so desmond could be born to stop it.
They were created to stop the first disaster that pretty much wiped them out. They were used too send messages into future to warn humanity about the second disaster.
Then why did you say they didn't have a leader? Or that they didn't die. You aren't making any sense.
Dude, have you really played the game? Becuase you sound like you have no idea what you talking about. Bayek kills their leader at the end of game. Its the lion, Falvouis. He uses the apple to take control of the empire. Bayek and aya kill them all.
Caesar wasn't even mentioned when bayek met cleopatra. He wasn't even a puppet. He took over when their leader died and prety much changed them into the templar. Cleopatras brother was their puppet. they never controlled caesar. If anything it was the opposite.
The only thing that doesn't make ay sense is that there would be no viable dna from a mummy. Dna has a half life of 50 years. You couldn't get any usable dna from a mummy. It is science fiction though so ill let it pass. I don't like this new animus at all though. Layla is awful. I wish the modern day protagonist was desmond's son. Bayek could still he an ancestor of desmond though. Aya and bayek are still barried together so they obviously reconsile at some piont. They could still have another kid or bayek could of hooked up with a roman woman and started ezio's family line.
I guess, I'm back.
More like caesar was the puppet master in the end but at first ya he was. If caesar would of never jioned the order of ancients most likely the wouldn't be the templar order we know. I'm sure we will find out more of his role he played in creating the templars in the future. He probably came up with their tennets qnd that is why he ismthe father of understanding.
No it doesn't. He is called the father of understanding at the end of the game. Caesar isn't even a member of the order of ancients till the end of the game if he ever was and the order of the ancients is transformed into the templar order most likely by caesar. The father of understanding has nothing to do with the order ancients. Otherwise the the other members of order of the ancients would probably mention it. Oh and caesar isn't even mentioned the first time bayek meet cleopatra. They speak about 3 members of the order of ancients thats it. If you have it you should know all this. The only time the father of understanding is mention is when aya is told he is the father of understanding by septimus.
How about play the game. The wiki isn't 100 percent correct. Plus my original comment was directed at the op not you.
No he founded the templar order and created their doctrine. It doesn't say that when it probably should.
Caesar is the father understanding. I think he founded the templars order. He Came up with their doctrine thats why he is the father of understanding. So yes they are.