By reviewing the Creed and its principles, I have noticed that some of its reasoning may arguably justify the principles of anarchism, the political philosophy that views systems of government and state as unjust, even unnatural, entities that are naturally oppressive and must be removed.
Why do the Hidden Ones oppose the Templars? The Creed teaches that “nothing is true” meaning that true, universal knowledge of metaphysical concepts, namely morality, are indefinite and beyond the full comprehension of mankind. Thus, individuals must determine for themselves what is morally just, but must remember that the conclusions we reach are not true conclusions, but rather our unique perceptions of reality. Thus, they can be contradicted and falsified by anyone else’s own conclusions. Thus, their is no definitely proven form of moral truth.
Thus, this is why they oppose the Templars new world order. They argue, if there is no definitely proven form truth, then what gives the Templars the right to impose their version of it on the world. Keeping this mind, following this logical philosophy, what gives governments the right to exert their own version of truth on tens of millions of people, especially if the vast majority don’t believe in that truth?
Based on this, the Creed seems to justify, or rather add emphasis to these same arguments that many anarchists have argued for generations.