Talk:Napoleon II

Candidate for deletion
From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be deleted. The reason is because this judgment is invariably subjective and arbitrary without an established criteria. Wiki are supposed to be inclusionistic, hence why we have stub templates to mark articles which are stubs but may or may not have more information possible for them. Over at Wookieepedia, we have articles as short as pendle and rumbat though I suppose you might make the case that those subjects don't have real-world equivalents. In any case, my point still stands. This sort of labeling is arbitrary. If it is in an AC source, then the same standard across all wikis should be applied, it should stand. Sol Pacificus (Cyfiero) 21:34, August 3, 2017 (UTC)