User blog comment:Assassin for the argonauts/ACIVBF - What's the point?/@comment-4999424-20130529135351/@comment-4068211-20130605120903

It's not cluelessness it's called 'reducto ad absurdum' i.e.taking an 'argument' to it's extreme to support a point. Basically a lot of build up for Desmond's fate for what is seemingly little payoff for a main character. The comment I wrote about the Miles Mystery was the attitude going into ACIII - the questions we wanted answers to, we received them and he died all in one go and it wasn't satisfying.

And Outsider there is no reference to who the 'Eve' is yet nor is there a solid answer for the 'son' question. Just theorising!

But I do like Brave wolf's comment! :O Woah