User blog comment:Abelzorus Prime/The Dark Assassin/@comment-90.218.118.81-20140713210507/@comment-90.218.118.81-20140714171919

"Also Haytham did not make a copy of the journal, taking it from Juan in 1747 and handing it to Birch when he returned to Britain, having taken several peaks into the book. The book was written to detail the First Civilization research, and also had the handwritings of several other people. Haytham had no idea of his father being a pirate or an Assassin when he reunited with Jenny in 1758, so no, that particular journal did not detail Edward's personal life"

Oh dear, oh dear... Incorrect... Assassin's Creed Forsaken Page 318:

"Moments later he was asking, "Where is the book?" with a fidgety sound to his voice. "William Johnson has made a copy..."...

So Haytham did have a copy made. And you will also find that Haytham DID learn about Edward being an Assassin, way, way before finding Jenny. Just before he ends up under Braddock's orders I believe. And unless Edward had created two journals, Haytham has read it. But Haytham does make note that Edward did not lie to him and that Haytham's journal was him doing the same for Connor. it is important to remember we only see sections of the journals. and that their will be many more entries and secrets detailed that are only hinted at us. Why would we have seen any entires in Forsaken where Haytham talks about Edward's past, before IV is announced.

As to the other point... I can only explain it now, in the most basic way possible. Whether or not you mean to... you show a biasness towards the Assassins' morality. Doesn't matter if one is slightly more loose with their morals or not... both are as bad and guilty as one another.

But as you said, we have gone of topic. It was nice discussing the morality of the Orders with you :).