Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-5088097-20171202154949/@comment-34619222-20180306220217

Ghost Leader wrote: Sol Pacificus wrote:

Imperator Scottorum wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote: The story set in motion with Origins is the beginning of the Creed. Any follow-up continuing that story should stay in the same general time period and geographical area. Jumping ahead centuries to when the Creed and the Brotherhood are in full swing as part of an origin story makes no sense, like telling the story of the automobile and jumping from Henry Ford and the Model T to the '68 Mustang. Yeah, that would make more sense plus I thought I heard something akin to them wanting to do a trilogy set in antiquity thus if they would so Feudal Japan it would not be done anytime soon. That actually does not make much sense, as the next installment does not necessarily have to deal with the origin story of the Assassins at all. The origin story isn't the overarching story of Origins, but the story of the regression segments of the game. There's still more story to be told there, though. When did the Hidden Ones and the Order become the Assassins and the Templars, how did both spread across the globe, etc.. Leaving off without telling the whole story here would be really unfortunate. From reading the Wiki, it seems to say that the Hidden Ones became the Assassins around the time of the Crusades (which'd also be the time period when the Order became the Templars. That's what I recall reading anyways