User blog comment:Abelzorus Prime/The Dark Assassin/@comment-90.218.118.81-20140713210507/@comment-90.218.118.81-20140714181550

No need to be a like that!

Your point was clear, and I understood it... that doesn't stop a biasness coming out in it. Just because you meant one thing does not mean another thing has not been put across. But whatever, clearly no reasoning with you.

However, it was not Digweed, it was one of the chaps beating him up. Rest your case? But you're wrong again. The journal was A) not fully in Haytham's possession and B) was still being decoded.

All I have done is put a potential at you (The Journal) and have identified it as such; A possibility, with no proof to fully dispute it, nor to fully confirm it... all you keep doing is throwing things at me, hoping it is the answer and saying: "No... you don't understand"... I understand perfectly... you are trying to make a distinction between two morally bad parties that are both guilty of morally bad acts.

No distinction can be made. BOTH have performed the same morally bad acts. both are as bad as each other: it is stupid declaring one act of murder or kidnap or whatever as being worse than another. There really is nothing more to it. I tried to bring a respectful close to our discussion, and you basically acted like a child throwing his toys at me. So again: It was nice speaking to you, take care.