User blog comment:Master Sima Yi/Assassinews 05-08-'14 – Assassin's Creed: Rogue announced/@comment-86.61.27.86-20140914164447/@comment-3244113-20140915193531

Well, Garnier's Experiments are not totally bad when you consider the bigger picture

Like the slaver who was taking the "dregs of society". Garnier also took in the dregs of society. In the result that they changed people barely existing into productive people with a purpose. It was morally bad... but in the long run, turning people just existing into people with meaning and purpose.If Malik hadn't retrieved the apple, Garnier would have used it to "save" these people without the dodgy experiments...

The thing I liked about AC(1) is that the 9 were moving separately but also together, each a piece in a bigger puzzle... alone it looked very bad... piecing those people and their actions together, and you get an actual plan that promotes peace and an end to war and a future of prosperity.

Liberation's Templars were just... not nice plain and simple... hence the corrupting of the events by Abstergo.

How can someone declare Hickey a good Templar? The guy wanted two things: Money and influence... he even says so.

Johnson turned to violence because diplomacy wasn't working. Stupid move, but he felt as if it wasn't going anywhere, becoming frustrated, and making a silly choice. Haytham mocks him for this in Forsaken.