User blog comment:ConnorKenwayRatonhnhaké:ton/How do you think Desmond's story will end?/@comment-4435191-20120726094136/@comment-5336493-20120726134918

Now here is the part you may have missed: The Borgias were the Templar pure bad guys per say, not all Templars were like that, but those were the views of the Borgia family, which in turn were the leading bad guys of ACII and AC:B.

Also, I am not sure what is bad with some set pieces too give a change of pace. The problem with AC1 was how repetitive it was *REALLY, REALLY repetitive*

The reason AC1 seemed the most plausible was because the Templars actually existed in Altairs time, same with the Hashashin.

And Ezio did have a story arc, a huge one. Which spanned 3 games [:

The focus was still on the characters, I love Altair over Ezio, but Ezio was much better developed compared to Altair. And the fact that all of them had opinions on his way were possible because Altair was designed as having very loose views on The Creed,

My memory may be a bit foggy, but when did we have too jump 5 stories into a pavement? .__.